BLOG

Terug naar het overzicht

3M’s Innovation Crisis: George & Jimmy

op 12.06.2007 516 keer bezocht

Cover Business Week June 11, 2007

The cover of Business week on June 11th does not let imagination into play and features very bold: 3M’s Innovation Crisis: How Six Sigma Almost Smothered Its Idea Culture. Another article in their must-have inside innovation dossier heads Six Sigma: So Yesterday? – In an innovation economy, it’s no longer a cure-all.

James McNerney

Those titles set the scene for a story about how the fathers of invention seek a balance between operational efficiency and creativity. James McNerney, a charismatic GE executive took up the CEO role at 3M in December 2000, started rationalising and introduced Six Sigma in every corner of the enterprise, including R&D. 3M’s operating margins went up from 17% in 2001 to 23% in 2005. Nice scorecard for McNermey, who took up the captain’s role at Boeing in 2006.

In the same timeframe at the company that has always prided itself on drawing at least 1/3rd of sales from products released in the last 5 years, that fraction had slipped to only one quarter. James McNerney’s successor, George Buckley, needed to reinstall the proud 3M creative culture, while keeping the advantages of the lean processes. Therefore he releases the Six Sigma pressure on R&D, while at the same time increasing the R&D budget with 20% and focussing 3M’s research on its ’45 core areas’.

Two striking quotes from the article:

  • Defenders of Six Sigma at 3M claim that a more systematic new-product introduction process allows innovations to get to market faster. But Art Fry, the Post-it note inventor, disagrees. In fact, he places the blame for 3M’s recent lack of innovative sizzle squarely on Six Sigma’s application in 3M’s research labs. Innovation, he says, is “a numbers game. You have to go through 5,000 to 6,000 raw ideas to find one successful business.” Six Sigma would ask, why not eliminate all that waste and just come up with the right idea the first time? That way of thinking, says Fry, can have serious side effects. “
  • George Buckley himself explains: “You cannot create in that atmosphere of confinement or sameness, perhaps one of the mistakes that we made as a company—it’s one of the dangers of Six Sigma—is that when you value sameness more than you value creativity, I think you potentially undermine the heart and soul of a company like 3M.”

source: Business Week

Gerelateerde artikels

Geef je mening

  • G. Van Room

    Tja, maar als Buckley (toch niet van de minste) aangeeft dat Six Sigma strikt volgen niet altijd een even goede invloed op 3M (toch ook niet van de minste) had, moet je er toch even bij stilstaan. Systematiek, efficiëntie, structuur = O.K. Maar niet ten koste van de vrijheid en free spirit die je soms nodig hebt. Da’s de uitdaging, die twee verzoenen.

  • Daniel Van Eeckhoutte

    Hier haalt men 2 zaken door elkaar zonder goed na te beseffen waarover het gaat.

    Six Sigma is een methodologie die sterk gebruik maakt van statistiek: beslissingen zijn gefundeerd en processen geoptimaliseerd. Er is o.a. een tool “Design of experiments” die onze R&D graag gebruikt: het laat tijd winnen en je resultaten zijn beter, wat kan er toch tegen zijn om “wetenschappelijk én operationeel verantwoord” te werken?

    Nostalgie naar de tijd dat er een piratenvlag hing boven het gebouw van R&D?

Flanders DC nieuwsbrief NL

Ontvang onze nieuwsbrief:

  • Creativiteitsnieuws
  • Inspirerende artikels
  • Kortingen op events

Blijf ook op de hoogte via: Linkedin, RSS, Twitter, Facebook

Wij delen ook op Twitter